The Internet Innovation Alliance is a broad-based coalition of business and non-profit organizations that aim to ensure every American, regardless of race, income or geography, has access to the critical tool that is broadband Internet. The IIA seeks to promote public policies that support equal opportunity for universal broadband availability and adoption so that everyone, everywhere can seize the benefits of the Internet - from education to health care, employment to community building, civic engagement and beyond.
The leaders and supporters
of IIA
Bruce P. Mehlman
Co-Chairman
David Sutphen
Co-Chairman
Larry Irving
Former Co-Chairman
Browse IIA's reference center for the latest stats, facts and studies
The Digital Divide
Broadband and the digital divide
Jobs and Investment
Broadband enables new job creation
Data Calculator
How much data do you use?
Learn about IIA's many outreach events
Read past and current stories about the IIA
IIA's constantly updated blog on all things broadband and technology
Blog posts tagged with 'Government'
Tuesday, November 03
Via the BBC comes the strange story of a small town city council, a muckraking blogger, and the mass resignation due to criticism from that blogger.
Wednesday, September 16
Computer World has news on Google’s latest move toward worldwide domination:
Google will offer cloud-computing services designed specifically for U.S. government agencies starting next year, the company announced Tuesday at the NASA Ames Research Center.
The services will give government agencies a way to purchase services such as Google Apps, by ensuring that they meet regulatory requirements, said Matthew Glotzbach, director of product management with Google enterprise.
Following in Apple’s footsteps, the U.S. government has created its own “app store.” Reports the New York Times:
On Tuesday, Vivek Kundra, the federal chief information officer, unveiled Apps.Gov, a Web site where federal agencies will able to buy so-called cloud computing applications and services that have been approved by the government to replace more costly and cumbersome computing services at their own locations.
The push to promote cloud computing is part of the Obama administration’s effort to modernize the government’s information technology systems and to help reduce the $75 billion annual budget for federal I.T. in the process.
Friday, August 28
The late Senator Ted Kennedy wasn’t just the “Lion of the Senate,” he was also the first Senator to use the Internet to communicate with his constituents.
Monday, April 27
With all the media attention on the so-called “Swine Flu,” the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have turned to Twitter to keep the public informed:
Wednesday, April 15
Raw Story reports that a cybersecurity bill proposed in the Senate contains language that would allow the federal government to shut down the Internet during a crisis:
The bill’s draft states that “the president may order a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic” and would give the government ongoing access to “all relevant data concerning (critical infrastructure) networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access.”
Authored by Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia and Republican Olympia Snowe of Maine, the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 seeks to create a Cybersecurity Czar to centralize power now held by the Pentagon, National Security Agency, Department of Commerce and the Department of Homeland Security.
Proponents of the bill say the provision is necessary to for the protection of America. Critics, however, are worried the bill reaches too far:
Organizations like the Center for Democracy and Technology fear if passed in its current form, the proposal leaves too much discretion of just what defines critical infrastructure. The bill would also impose mandates for designated private networks and systems, including standardized security software, testing, licensing and certification of cyber-security professionals.
“I’d be very surprised if it doesn’t include communications systems, which are certainly critical infrastructure,” CDT General Counsel Greg Nojeim told eWEEK. “The president would decide not only what is critical infrastructure but also what is an emergency.”
Adds Jennifer Granick, civil liberties director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Essentially, the Act would federalize critical infrastructure security. Since many systems (banks, telecommunications, energy)are in the hands of the private sector, the bill would create a major shift of power away from users and companies to the federal government.”
Tuesday, March 31
Over in the UK, a new proposal would allow the government to keep tabs on how citizens use popular social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace. Civil liberty watchdogs are, predictably, up in arms about the plan. And as the BBC reports, so are some politicians:
Liberal Democrat MP Tom Brake said the websites contained sensitive personal details and he was concerned information could leak from any government-controlled database.
The Independent newspaper quoted him as saying similar plans to store phone and email records threatened to be the “most expensive snooper’s charter in history”.
“It is deeply worrying that they now intend to monitor social networking sites which contain very sensitive data like sexual orientation, religious beliefs and political views,” he said.
Facebook’s official response is that the proposal is “overkill.” As for the government’s response:
A spokesman said: “The government has no interest in the content of people’s social network sites and this is not going to be part of our upcoming consultation.
“We have been clear that the communications revolution has been rapid in this country and the way in which we collect communications data needs to change, so that law enforcement agencies can maintain their ability to tackle terrorism and gather evidence.”
Stay tuned…
Wednesday, February 11
As eWeek reports, two days ago President Obama ordered Homeland Security advisors to conduct a 60-day review of the nation’s cyber-security.
“The national security and economic health of the United States depend on the security, stability and integrity of our nation’s cyberspace, both in the public and private sectors,” John Brennan, assistant to the president for Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, said in a White House statement. “The President is confident that we can protect our nation’s critical cyber-infrastructure while at the same time adhering to the rule of law and safeguarding privacy rights and civil liberties.”
Again, that was just two days ago. And as it turns out, the review process quickly proved to be necessary, as just yesterday Network World reported that:
The Federal Aviation Administration has joined the growing list of government agencies that have had their supposedly safe systems hacked. The agency this week notified about 45,000 employees that one of its servers was hacked into and employee personal identity information was stolen.
The FAA was quick to say the server that was accessed was not connected to the operation of the air traffic control system or any other FAA operational system. It did say two of the 48 files on the breached computer server contained personal information about more than 45,000 FAA employees and retirees who were on the FAA’s rolls as of the first week of February 2006.
With President Obama planning to completely overhaul government networks, cyber security is going to be more important than ever.
Tuesday, January 20
The official White House website has bee refreshed and re-launched—complete with a blog.
Monday, December 22
Ars Technica has an interesting report on the Department of Homeland Security’s recent “Cyberwargames.”
The Cyber Strategic Inquiry, held at the Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday and Thursday, brought together 230 top leaders from government and the private sector for an elaborate simulation of a large-scale attack on America’s information infrastructure. The simulation was run by the consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton in collaboration with Business Executives for National Security.
Participants were split into four teams comprising government officials, a private-sector team, a civil-society team, and a mixed-membership control group. The teams represented groups whose response in a real attack would be critical. On the government side, there was Homeland Security, the intelligence community, the Defense Department, and various civilian agencies; on the business side, financial services, telecom and IT firms, energy companies, and the transportation sector.
Unfortunately, the results from the tests weren’t exactly encouraging:
“There isn’t a response or a game plan,” Booz Allen Senior VP Mark Gerencser told reporters, “There isn’t really anybody in charge.” House Homeland Security Chair James Langevin (D-RI) agreed, saying “we’re way behind where we need to be now.”
As the U.S. aims to build up its broadband infrastructure, these sort of doomsday games are going to become more and more vital.
Maybe you’re an all-out advocate? Perhaps you strongly oppose the plan? Wherever you stand, the battle over the FCC’s free-but-filtered (for “inappropriate content) broadband plan remains alive, but hanging on by a thread. According to DSLReports:
Rules or no rules, it’s still unlikely that this plan ever makes it past the planning stage. Debate next year over government’s involvement in broadband infrastructure is going to involve countless different plans supported by very large companies, and it’s very likely the M2Z plan gets lost in the mix. The plan always had a tough uphill fight, both against incumbent lobbyists and those who believe the filters, required as a spectrum auction condition, are unconstitutional.
« Back to Blog Home
Broadband Fact Book
Special Reports
Sign the Petition
IIA Broadband Symposium - Universal Broadband: Access for All Americans
IIA Internet Academy
Press Releases
Most Recent Posts
Leave a Comment